Gäste-WLAN
Scannen Sie den QR-Code mit Ihrem Smartphone, um sich sofort mit dem Internet zu verbinden.
Since 8 December 2023, wine and aromatised wine products placed on the EU market carry an ingredient list and a nutrition declaration. Both may be printed on the label or delivered electronically through a QR code. For an importer or a buyer signing off a label, that flexibility is where the mistakes happen, because the split between printed and digital is not free to choose.
This page is written for the person checking a label before a batch goes to market, not for the producer deciding how to lay out a 100 mm label. The obligations are the same ones that apply to the producer in Germany; the practical questions are different.
Two items cannot move behind the code. The energy value, marked with the letter "E", has to appear on the package, and so do the allergens, in practice the sulphites declaration. Everything else in the nutrition declaration, and the full ingredient list, may be provided electronically.
For a label check this is the first thing to verify, and it is the most common defect: a batch printed with the full nutrition table on the website and no energy value on the bottle. The code resolves, the data is complete, and the label still fails.
The electronic label may not carry sales or marketing content, and it may not collect personal data from the person scanning it. A shop link, a newsletter form or an analytics pixel on the same page is a compliance risk that buys nothing.
In practice this rules out most redirect services: a short link whose whole purpose is to count scans is collecting data on the page the regulation is talking about. A code that points directly at a page you control, with no counting, is the cleaner construction.
Each wine needs its own destination, because ingredients and values differ between wines. The regulation allows a shared code where a price list with an ordering function covers several wines, pointing at a page that carries the information for all of them. That is a narrow exception, not a shortcut for an entire range.
For an importer holding several producers, this is where batches get mixed up: a shared page for a range is fine for the list, and wrong for the individual bottles.
The information has to stay available for as long as the product is on the market. That is longer than most campaign pages live, and it is the part that fails quietly: a batch printed in 2024 scans fine in 2024 and dead in 2027.
Before accepting a label, check that the destination is a permanent address you or the producer controls, without a login, without a redirect service and without an expiry. A code is only as durable as the page behind it.
On a 100 mm label, 15 mm is the floor for a code and 18 mm is comfortable, with a quiet zone of at least four modules. Error correction level Q or H survives the handling a bottle gets in a cold chain.
The code must be darker than its background. A light code reversed out of a dark label photographs well and fails in a cellar or a restaurant with dim lighting. Print, then scan the actual material with three devices before the run, not the PDF.
Check the two printed items first. If the energy value or the sulphite statement is missing, the batch does not need a fix to the website, it needs new labels.
Ask for the destination address and scan it. A code pointing at a generic producer homepage is not a compliant e-label, even if the data exists somewhere on that site.
One destination per wine, in the languages of the markets it ships to, with no shop or tracking elements on the page.
Longevity matters more than design here. If nobody can say who maintains the destination page, assume it will not survive the vintage.
No. The obligation is on the ingredient list and the nutrition declaration, not on the technology. Either may be printed or provided electronically, and the QR code is simply the usual way of doing the latter because the lists do not fit on a 100 mm label in several languages.
No. The energy value, marked with the letter "E", and the allergens must remain on the package. The rest of the nutrition declaration and the ingredient list may be electronic.
No. The regulation excludes sales and marketing content from the electronic label, and it excludes the collection of personal data. A page with a shop, a form or a tracking pixel is exposed.
No. Regulation (EU) 2021/2117 covers wine and aromatised wine products. Other categories may provide nutrition information voluntarily, but there is no equivalent obligation.
The e-label is no longer available, which leaves the batch non-compliant regardless of what was printed. Use a permanent address under your own control, and do not route it through a short-link service that can be switched off.
This page summarises the rules named above and links the primary sources. It is not legal advice. Whether an obligation applies to your case depends on your company size, the product, the building and the contract, and that question belongs to a lawyer or a competent authority.